Religion and Science in Conflict—Scientists are much less religious than other Americans

Religiosity, education, and scientific occupations: 1988-2010 GSS

Religiosity, education, and scientific occupations: 1988-2010 GSS

Representatives of the Templeton Foundation were once again claiming in a “research paper” presented at the AAAS (jesus…..) that religion and science are the same thing, and that religious people love science and scientists love religion—maybe not the elitist scientists, but you know, the everyday ordinary scientists (with the lab in their basement?). We have no idea what data were being presented, since I do not associate with religious people masquerading as scientists nor would I attend the AAAS meetings since I’m just a sociologist. I assume it’s the usual shit data, but probably new, and even shittier! So, just for shits and giggles I took the GSS occupational codes (the 1980 version which is good from 1988-2010 in the GSS) and I classified all of the “regular” scientists (number of scientists or STEM occupations with a college degree is 750 for religious identification, 532 for Bible beliefs, and 330 for beliefs about gods)—including also engineers and physicians. As you can see above, the scientists are significantly and substantially less religious than other people who hold a college degree, and especially from other Americans who do not have a college degree. Notably, people who have a college degree are also less religious than are the majority of Americans who do not have a college degree. Religion hinders educational attainment, and educational attainment reduces religiosity.

Scientists are four times less likely to believe that the bible is the word of god when compared to the majority of uneducated Americans. And, ,they’re nearly half as likely to believe the bible is the word of some god when compared to other college educated Americans. And, scientists are about four times as likely to think the Bible is a book of fables than to think it the word of some god. About a third of scientists don’t believe in a god, compared to about 14% of uneducated Americans and 25% of college educated Americans. Under 9% of scientists identify with sectarian protestant denominations (what Templeton likes to call “evangelicals”), while 29% of uneducated Americans identify with these groups (only 14% of college graduates identify as sectarian).  And, scientists are almost twice as likely to reject religious identification when compared to the uneducated.

Science and religion are in conflict, and because of that religious people are hostile to science (more on this soon), and scientists avoid religion, particularly noxious varieties of fundamentalist religion.


3 Responses to “Religion and Science in Conflict—Scientists are much less religious than other Americans”

  1. etseq Says:

    Well smarty pants that’s why you don’t get millions of dollars from the rotting corpse of fake wannabee Anglophile “knight” who renounced his US citizenship and became a naturalized dual Bahamian/British subject to dodge taxes and legally acquire a royal title (whats the point of a knighthood if you can’t use “Sir” – isn’t that the dream of every boy from Tennessee?) in order to construct studies that use vague and counter-intuitive definitions of of religion and/or spirituality, slice and dice your sample by including social scientists but not mathematicians, and have a full PR apparatus hard at work spinning the press… Data Smata…


  2. Daniel P. Says:

    Sherkat – Regnerus testified in Michigan today and went after you!

    Amy Lange @langeamyFOX2
    Regnerus says the audit was undertaken by an individual who doesn’t like him and has ranted against him for years #gaymarriage
    3:56 PM – 3 Mar 2014

    Amy Lange ‏@langeamyFOX2 4h
    Heyse – in your opinion it was not a fair audit?
    Regnerus – that’s an understatement #gaymarriage

  3. sherkat Says:

    Yeah, Ask that asshole who helped him get his job at the University of Texas at Austin. I had supported Regnerus’ career and considered him a sincere colleague up until the time he started his “women are whores” schtick in 2007. Even after my conflict with Christian Smith and Bradley Wilcox I sincerely thought that Regnerus was a normal guy and a strong researcher. I still think he’s the smartest of the Christianist researchers, and that’s how I know he is simply a political ideologue these days. He knows better, and I know he does. Idiots like Christian Smith and Bradley Wilcox can hide behind incompetence and ignorance, but I know that Regnerus knows better. I’ll have a post soon about Regnerus coming out to me about this, when I didn’t know what he was talking about.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: